- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:42:55 +0900
- To: "Mike Schinkel" <mikeschinkel@gmail.com>
- Cc: "'RDFa'" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, "'SWD WG'" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, <www-qa@w3.org>
Le 15 févr. 2007 à 12:21, Mike Schinkel a écrit :
> Karl Dubost wrote:
>> Longer: Microformats call it "Unique Root Class Names". To
>> avoid name clashes in software implementing microformats
>> scrapping, they have to be sure to scope the right
>> microformat. The switching mechanism
>> (namespace) is a root class name which is nesting the other
>> class values.[2] So it is a "namespace", microformats just do
>> not call it a namespace.
>
> I hate to be a contrarian,
oooh but I'm not saying that there is no issue ;) with the unique
root class names.
> but I've brought up the issue of disambiguation
> on the Microformats list and discussed it at length, and IMO they
> are not
> willing to address the issue with any level of realism [1].
been there, done that. :)
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2007 03:43:23 UTC