- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:00:13 +0100
- To: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, "SWD WG" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, www-qa@w3.org
But Microformats had no choice, since their aim was to use only what was in XHTML already. This is why they use class, and why they misuse @title where we use @content. Just because Microformats does it is not a reason in itself to copy it. And furthermore, if we use something else there is more chance that RDFa and microformats can coexist in a single document. Steven On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:39:16 +0100, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> wrote: > Ivan Herman wrote: >> +1 >> >> Steven Pemberton wrote: >>> I want to reraise my position: leave class alone, and use something new >>> for what we want. I still have the feeling that @role can do the job. > > There is a *huge* lost opportunity if we do this, which is that we don't > show a natural progression from microformats to RDFa. Microformats > already use the CLASS attribute for this kind of thing, and it's a well > accepted practice. New attributes should be used sparingly. > > -Ben
Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2007 14:00:25 UTC