[RDFa] Overview (was: [RDFa] Yet another QA-related question)

Karl, Tim, All,

Thanks a lot for your comments. Due to these encouraging
postings I have now put together a very first draft of the
umbrella document [1].

Ben (1): This doc (cf. section 4) also partly addresses the
action you (we both) haven taken to list the RDF coverage [2].

Ben (2): I also included the GRDDL-RDFa relation into this doc;
IMHO it should be presented prominently to ensure that people reading
the docs know who plays which role ;)

Please let me know what you think ...

Cheers,
	Michael


Note: As this is the very first draft, do _not_ expect to much,
      though it should show the direction and tries to address
      all the issues (esp. Tim raised w.r.t. terminology, etc.)
      raised beforehand.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2007/02/12-htmltf-minutes.html#action08

----------------------------------------------------------
 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
  
 http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
----------------------------------------------------------
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Karl Dubost [mailto:karl@w3.org] 
>Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 7:17 AM
>To: Hausenblas, Michael
>Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org; public-swd-wg@w3.org; www-qa@w3.org
>Subject: Re: [RDFa] Yet another QA-related question
>
>
>Le 9 févr. 2007 à 17:27, Hausenblas, Michael a écrit :
>> So what is missing in my (limited) understanding is a document
>> that actually _is_ the umbrella specification document. This
>> document (overview, guide, etc.) might state that the RDFa spec
>> consists of the following documents, as of [2]:
>>
>>  + XHTML Metainformation Module
>>  + XHTML Metainformation Attributes Module
>>  + RDFa Primer 1.0
>>  + RDFa Syntax
>>  + RDFa Use Cases: Scenarios for Embedding RDF in HTML
>>  + RDFa Test Suite
>>
>> Am I totally wrong with this?
>
>Totally on target! Your umbrellas specification is the document which  
>ties everything together, help to have a global overview of the  
>technology, it is somehow the key entrance for the rest of your  
>documents. It is a kind of meta table of contents with guidance or  
>the book introduction if you prefer.
>
>> Cheers,
>> 	Michael
>>
>>
>> BTW, Karl D.: As I followed your advice to CC: www-qa@w3.org,
>>      I would very much appreciate comments from your side as well :)
>>      The same applies to other posts ([4] and [5]) from the last days
>> ...
>
>
>That's really cool.  Answering the questions, you are asking, will  
>benefit other people. QA Framework: Specification is a set of tools  
>to better define a technology and help to write a specification.
>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/spec-variability/
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa#RDFa_documents
>> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/spec-variability/#umbrella
>> [4]
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Feb/ 
>> 0028.
>> html
>> [5]
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Feb/ 
>> 0027.
>> html
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>  Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
>>  Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
>>  JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
>>  Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA
>>
>>  <office>
>>     phone: +43-316-876-1193 (fax:-1191)
>>    e-mail: michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at
>>       web: http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
>>
>>  <private>
>>    mobile: +43-660-7621761
>>       web: http://www.sw-app.org/
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>-- 
>Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
>W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
>   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
>      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 14:50:20 UTC