- From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:06:19 +0100
- To: <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, <www-qa@w3.org>
All, Based on [1] I would like to raise some issues regarding our RDFa documents [2]. This is done, at least for now, from the point of view of the RDFa Test Suite; might be valid in general as well ... 1. Regarding section '2.2.2 What needs to conform?' in [1]: Do we address this requirement? In this context it might help to specify the 'products'. Does it help here to propose a division in REST-style extractor, and DOM-operating extractor? Did we even define how we call the 'XHTML+RDFa -> RDF' service, anyway? Is it a transformation, an extraction, etc. ? 2. Regarding section '2.3.2 What is mandatory?' in [1]: Though I found two occurrences of 'must' in the RDFa syntax document [3], I am not sure if we already make use of the RFC 2119 [4] keywords in a sensible way. 3. Regarding section '2.4.5 Error Handling' in [1]: Do we need to specify an error handling mechanism? Though it might be a bit of an overkill and this is not a strict requirement, but rather a good practice, we might want to contemplate on this one as well. I admit that all of this might seem to be a bit early, but again, in the light of setting up the RDFa Test Suite, some of these and other related issues bother me :) Cheers, Michael [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa#RDFa_documents [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/syntax/ [4] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt ---------------------------------------------------------- Michael Hausenblas, MSc. Institute of Information Systems & Information Management JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA <office> phone: +43-316-876-1193 (fax:-1191) e-mail: michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at web: http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ <private> mobile: +43-660-7621761 web: http://www.sw-app.org/ ----------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 09:06:46 UTC