- From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:52:20 +0200
- To: www-qa@w3.org
Hi, At 19:44 7/08/2007, david_marston@us.ibm.com wrote: >Hausenblas, Michael wrote: > > However, what is missing IMHO are clear instructions how > > to actually do the test *review*....I think > > we are all after a transparent, unambiguous process... > >And Ivan Herman then responded to agree that a "disciplined" process >should be available when needed. To push that discussion further, I >suggest that you look at the test review procedure [1] that the old >OASIS TC on XSLT wrote. Another example of a review process that you may want to look at is the one by the WAI's Test Samples Development Task Force at <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/process>. Best regards, Christophe Strobbe >.................David Marston > >[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/1914/reviews.htm -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442 B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/ Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2007 17:52:38 UTC