- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 14:29:29 +0900
- To: www-qa@w3.org
This is an excerpt of W3C QA IG F2F minutes of Mandelieu, France, 27/28 February 2006 Each topic indivually given to help the discussion. http://www.w3.org/QA/2006/03/minutes_of_qa_ig_f2f_at_the_w3.html QA Findings http://www.w3.org/QA/2006/03/minutes_of_qa_ig_f2f_at_the_w3#qa-findings [43]Tag Findings are short documents dealing with issues about architecture. The format is quite interesting and gathering the knowledge about one particular topic of Web architecture. Dominique Hazaël-Massieux has suggested that it might be possible to publish QA Findings. [43] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings For example, in MWI WG, they are writing best practices, some of these practices are not testable. So, they are not normative. An requirement don't have to be testable to be normative, but life become much harder if non testable normative requirements are provided in a specification. Having a summary of all discussions which have been done for this specific topic would be very useful and could serve as a QA Findings. When a discussion got enough momentum on the www-qa mailing-list, someone will take the responsibility about prototyping the topic on the [44]QA wiki and collect information. Once the document has reached maturity, we might publish it as a QA Finding, probably on the QA Weblog. [44] http://esw.w3.org/topic/QA ACTION: Dom to start a wiki page on testability/normativity before mid-March and will report on www-qa. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Wednesday, 8 March 2006 05:29:39 UTC