- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 14:29:29 +0900
- To: www-qa@w3.org
This is an excerpt of W3C QA IG F2F minutes of Mandelieu, France,
27/28 February 2006
Each topic indivually given to help the discussion.
http://www.w3.org/QA/2006/03/minutes_of_qa_ig_f2f_at_the_w3.html
QA Findings
http://www.w3.org/QA/2006/03/minutes_of_qa_ig_f2f_at_the_w3#qa-findings
[43]Tag Findings are short documents dealing with issues about
architecture. The format is quite interesting and gathering the
knowledge about one particular topic of Web architecture. Dominique
Hazaël-Massieux has suggested that it might be possible to publish
QA Findings.
[43] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
For example, in MWI WG, they are writing best practices, some of
these practices are not testable. So, they are not normative. An
requirement don't have to be testable to be normative, but life
become much harder if non testable normative requirements are
provided in a specification. Having a summary of all discussions
which have been done for this specific topic would be very useful
and could serve as a QA Findings.
When a discussion got enough momentum on the www-qa mailing-list,
someone will take the responsibility about prototyping the topic on
the [44]QA wiki and collect information. Once the document has
reached maturity, we might publish it as a QA Finding, probably on
the QA Weblog.
[44] http://esw.w3.org/topic/QA
ACTION: Dom to start a wiki page on testability/normativity before
mid-March and will report on www-qa.
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Wednesday, 8 March 2006 05:29:39 UTC