- From: David Latapie <david@empyree.org>
- Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 11:05:58 +0100
- To: www-qa@w3.org
- Cc: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
Hello, (I think cross-posting is legal in that case. Please tell me if it is not) This is a copy of a reply regarding the “CSS big picture”. The original topic was the multiplicity of proposals and the reason of their frequent refusals. Début du message réexpédié : > Réenvoyé-De : www-style@w3.org > De : David Latapie <david@empyree.org> > Date : 3 décembre 2006 10:31:08 HNEC > À : David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk> > Cc : www-style@w3.org > Objet : Rép : arguments and embedding > X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) > > > > Le 2 déc. 06 à 13:34, David Woolley a écrit : > >> >>> Does this never lead the rejectors to ask themselves /why/ >>> these "variations" are so frequently proposed ? Could it >> >> I think the main reason is that people don't look at the big >> picture when proposing them. > > Is there somewhere on the W3C some kind of paper about this? If > such a "big-picture" document exists, along with a compundium of > most frequent mistakes, I dare to think it would help. > > > -- > </david_latapie> > http://blog.empyree.org/ U+0F00 > > > -- </david_latapie> http://blog.empyree.org/ U+0F00
Received on Sunday, 3 December 2006 10:06:20 UTC