- From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 09:35:33 -0400
- To: www-qa@w3.org
I did send a response [1] on "Metadata Schema in RDF" on 20 March 2006. [1]: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2006Mar/0029.html ># Metadata Schema Document > >Dom has [sent to the mailing list][1] a draft of a schema for the >[test metadata document][4]. > >* [Metadata Schema in n3][2] >* [Metadata Schema in RDF][3] >The document has to be reviewed by > >* Patrick Curran - Deadline: 2006-04-11 >* Snorre >* Tim On "Test Assertions", I've prepared some initial comments, and can post complete review by 21 April 2006 (I'll be out on vacation week of April 10-14 2006) ># Test Assertions Dummy Guide > >Karl has published the [Test Assertion draft][5] in the dated space >in HTML. We still don't know about the status of this, and we didn't >receive comments from > >* Snorre >* Patrick - Deadline: 2006-04-11 >* Tim > >The document will be put with public access. > >[5]: http://www.w3.org/2006/03/test-assertion-guide.html [Member Only] > On "CSS Validator resources", do you want me to raise this with the CSSWG? ># CSS Validator resources > >Patrick has started to explore the possibility of resources for the >CSS Validator (java) and it seems it's on the positive side for now. >There are licensing issues. Patrick will discuss with Olivier about >it and give an abstract on progress. > On "Specification Reviews", when the WCAG2.0 Last Call WD is published, I can review it, since there have been quite a few changes from WCAG1.0.. ># Specification Reviews > >How to encourage people to make QA reviews of specifications.
Received on Friday, 7 April 2006 13:42:37 UTC