- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:51:31 -0400
- To: www-qa@w3.org
Hi QA IG, more and more often, I receive questions and/or comments from WGs about the testability of their specifications. It's quite interesting and shows part of the misunderstandings of what has to be done when testing a specification. I would like to know if you have ideas about the simple question of How do we test a specification? Types of comment * Our language is defining semantics, then is not testable or we can't create a test to prove implementation. * Our language is defining a framework communications between services, then it's dependent on the service and not testable. Do you have a set of guidelines to invite people to define the good questions for creating Test Cases? Example: I remember having this discussion about "blockquote", which is an element in HTML 4.01 to markup quotes in a text. Some people told me, it's not testable, because you can't prove that the text inside the element is really a quote. I agree with that but I think it's the wrong question. How do we prove that blockquote is implementable? (or useful). My suggestion was to prove that it was possible to implement by creating for example a tool which extracts in HTML the quotes of a text and then gives the possibility of a quote service. Extracting the content of the quote and the attribute cite, is a kind of implementation of blockquote. So you prove that the element is useful by showing that it's usable in the way it has been defined. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2005 20:51:24 UTC