- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 15:21:25 +0100
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- CC: www-qa@w3.org
Karl Dubost wrote: > > Dear Jeremy, > > Thanks for your comments on the Last Call version of the QA Framework: > Specification Guidelines[0] - 22 November 2004 > > After two weeks from now (on May 18, 2005), the lack of answer will be > considered as if you had accepted the comment. > > Thank you for your SpecGL review comments [1]. We especially > appreciate the positive feedback, about what you think works well in > SpecGL. Your single identified substantive issue regarding > identification of deprecated features, versus first versions of > specifications, was entered as issue #1051 [2]. The QA Working Group > accepted the comment, and we have revised the wording around > Requirement 12 [3] to indicate that the requirement is contingent on > there being previous version(s) of the specification. > Fine - that's great. Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 26 May 2005 14:21:47 UTC