W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > May 2005

Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Conformance is not a yes/no proposition (wrt filling an ICS)

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 16:02:56 +0000 (UTC)
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Cc: www-qa@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505031601500.5094@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Tue, 3 May 2005, Karl Dubost wrote:
> 
> Thank you for your comment, which the QA Working Group has accepted.  
> We have reworded the affected sections to clarify the meaning and use of 
> the Implementation Conformance Statement (ICS), including explaining the 
> meaning of checking Yes/No.  The affected sections now read: [...]

Although experience in the CSS community has made me skeptical of the 
benefits of vendors claiming "support" for a specification, I accept the 
resolution in its current form.

Cheers,
-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 16:03:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:36 UTC