- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 11:59:10 -0400
- To: www-qa@w3.org
- Cc: David Marston <david_marston@us.ibm.com>
Dear Dave, Thanks for your comments on the Last Call version of the QA Framework: Specification Guidelines[0] - 22 November 2004 After two weeks from now (on May 18, 2005), the lack of answer will be considered as if you had accepted the comment. Original comment (issue 986 [1]): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Aug/0099.html As a response to your comment, the QA Working Group has not accepted your comment. An additional decision of the QA WG has removed the "Umbrella Specification" topic from Specification Guidelines to move it to Variability in Specifications. One technique of Requirement 01 addresses the notion of Conformance when the technology is divided in multiple documents. [0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/ [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=986 [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#include- conformance-clause-principle -- Karl Dubost QA Working Group Chair http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 15:59:24 UTC