- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 11:19:48 -0400
- To: www-qa@w3.org
- Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Dear Chris, Thanks for your comments on the Last Call version of the QA Framework: Specification Guidelines[0] - 22 November 2004 After two weeks from now (on May 18, 2005), the lack of answer will be considered as if you had accepted the comment. Original comment (issue 1157 [1]): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Mar/0013.html As a response to your comment, the QA Working Group has accepted your comment and has added verbiage to new version of the ICS with - a comments column, - absolute links to the spec, - asking users to link back to the relevant spec parts. [2]: "The presentation is intended to be convenient for organizers and evaluators of QA projects in W3C Working Groups, to facilitate assessing specifications against the checkpoints. The table includes spaces for scoring each checkpoint, "yes" (satisfied), "no" (not satisfied), "n/a" (not applicable), and comments. Users of this ICS are encouraged to put links in the comments column back to the reviewed specification parts illustrating how it conforms to the Specification Guidelines." [0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/ [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1157 [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/specgl-ics -- Karl Dubost QA Working Group Chair http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 15:19:54 UTC