- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 11:12:46 -0400
- To: www-qa@w3.org
- Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Dear Chris, Thanks for your comments on the Last Call version of the QA Framework: Specification Guidelines[0] - 22 November 2004 After two weeks from now (on May 18, 2005), the lack of answer will be considered as if you had accepted the comment. Original comment (issue 1155): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Mar/0011.html The QA Working Group agrees that being more specific about the story can only helps understand the point made and is now making an explicit reference to itself in the text: In 2004, QA Working Group documents entered Candidate Recommendation prior to a thorough quality review, resulting in a huge number of issues to resolve and the eventual retreat back to Working Draft for major revisions. http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#practice-principle (while the story doesn't exactly match the reality of what happened, the QA Working Group believes it can still be used as a fair illustration of the point made) [0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/ -- Karl Dubost QA Working Group Chair http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 15:13:05 UTC