RE: [si] (SISR-DOC2) QA Review of Semantic Interpretation last ca ll draft

Hi Luc,

Le mercredi 06 juillet 2005 ŗ 04:31 -0400, Van Tichelen, Luc a ťcrit :
> We will discuss your feedback to SISR-DOC2.4 and SISR-DOC2.6 in the group.
> As to the glossary (DOC2.3) we will follow the convention.

Great, thanks.

> You didn't state anything explicitly about SISR-DOC2.5 (which is about
> additional examples and therefore pointed back to DOC2.2). Can we assume
> you're OK with DOC2.5 as you are with DOC2.2?

I had actually grouped both questions and answered just once. So indeed,
I'm OK with 2.5 as I am with 2.2

Dom
-- 
Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org

Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2005 08:44:59 UTC