RE: [si] (SISR-DOC2) QA Review of Semantic Interpretation last ca ll draft from Dominique Hazaël-Massieux on 2005-07-06 (www-qa@w3.org from July 2005)

From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 10:44:44 +0200
To: "Van Tichelen, Luc" <Luc.VanTichelen@scansoft.com>
Cc: www-qa@w3.org, www-voice@w3.org
Message-Id: <1120639484.5935.196.camel@stratustier>

Hi Luc,

Le mercredi 06 juillet 2005 à 04:31 -0400, Van Tichelen, Luc a écrit :
> We will discuss your feedback to SISR-DOC2.4 and SISR-DOC2.6 in the group.
> As to the glossary (DOC2.3) we will follow the convention.

Great, thanks.

> You didn't state anything explicitly about SISR-DOC2.5 (which is about
> additional examples and therefore pointed back to DOC2.2). Can we assume
> you're OK with DOC2.5 as you are with DOC2.2?

I had actually grouped both questions and answered just once. So indeed,
I'm OK with 2.5 as I am with 2.2

Dom
-- 
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org

Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2005 08:44:59 UTC