- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 09:38:38 -0500
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: www-qa@w3.org
Hi Ian, many thanks for your comments. Le 19 janv. 2005, à 09:52, Ian Hickson a écrit : > Some of the sections are empty. For example, take this markup: > > <h4 id="what-conform">2.2 What needs to conform</h4> > > <div id="implement"> > <div class="principle"> > <h4 id="implement-principle"><span class="principle-label">2.2 > Requirement A:</span> > Identify who or what will implement the specification.</h4> > </div> > ... > > It is semantically equivalent to (removing the semantically-neutral > <div>s, <span>s, and id=""s for clarity): > > <h4>2.2 What needs to conform</h4> > <h4>2.2 Requirement A: Identify who or what will implement the > specification.</h4> > ... I think I see your point. You are saying that the structure now is: 2. (h3) 2.2 (h4) 2.2 req A (h4) 2.3 (h4) 2.3 req A (h4) 2.3 req B (h4) And you recommend to be 2. (h3) 2.2 (h4) 2.2 req A (h5) 2.3 (h4) 2.3 req A (h5) 2.3 req B (h5) Luckily enough there's no h6 in the document, if yes we would need XHTML 2.0 to be able to express it. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 31 January 2005 14:38:40 UTC