- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:56:16 +0000 (UTC)
- To: www-qa@w3.org
Finally I would add one other good practice: specifications should not claim to be simple, easy, device-independent, conformant to WAAA or QAG, or make other claims about their quality or conformance to other specifications. While it is fine to indicate that one of the requirements of the specification may have been to be easy / device- independent / whatever, it should IMHO be up to the reader to make the determination of whether the working group was successful or not. (This is the last of the eleven comment mails I had on the QASG document. I hope they were of use.) Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2005 14:56:17 UTC