- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:54:08 -0500
- To: W3C QA Interest Group <www-qa@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <4d323d159b4ebd00b39630035bb57c81@w3.org>
Hi, There is a very interesting discussions about managing extensibility these days on W3C Mailing-list. I'm giving here a few references. The issue has started with a difficulty between xml:id specification and C14N specification, but it has been propagated to a whole namespace debate. Is it possible to add new attributes, new elements to a specification without changing the namespace. For example, you had XML 1.1 xml:lang later on have been added the attributes: xml:base xml:id so we can argue that XML 1.0 specification has been extended with two new attributes without changing the xml namespaces. Another case which is related. XHTML 1.0 has been released with the following namespace: http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml XHTML 1.1 has been issued with the same namespace even if there was an addition to the language which is Ruby, a set of elements to deal with japanese scripts for example. References to read on TAG Mailing list (start of threads): http://www.w3.org/mid/87u0olbhr4.fsf@nwalsh.com http://www.w3.org/mid/ 7874BFCCD289A645B5CE3935769F0B52750797@tigger.pureedge.com -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Saturday, 12 February 2005 03:59:40 UTC