Re: QASG last call comments: Empty sections in markup

On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Karl Dubost wrote:
> 
> You are saying that the structure now is:
> 
> 2. (h3)
> 	2.2 (h4)
> 	2.2 req A (h4)
> 	2.3 (h4)
> 	2.3 req A (h4)
> 	2.3 req B (h4)
> 
> And you recommend to be
> 
> 2. (h3)
> 	2.2 (h4)
> 		2.2 req A (h5)
> 	2.3 (h4)
> 		2.3 req A (h5)
> 		2.3 req B (h5)

Yes please.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2005 14:54:28 UTC