- From: Rajasekaran Deepak <deepakr@students.iiit.net>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 00:29:17 +0530
- To: www-qa@w3.org
* Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> 2004-03-31 > "On many servers, URIs include a file extension corresponding to the mime > type, or a directory name indicating the language, however, it often works > better to exclude the file extension and language from the URI and make > better use of content negotiation." Done. > a) RFC 3066 bis says > [[ > Use as precise a tag as possible, but no more specific than is > justified. For example, 'de' might suffice for tagging an email > written in German, while 'de-CH-1996' is probably unnecessarily > precise for such a task. > ]] > > I suggest that the wording should be changed to more accurately reflect RFC > 3066, and RFC 3066 bis wording. Done. * http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-phillips-langtags-01.txt > It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference > material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." I am citing the draft because I couldn't locate any RFC that supersedes it. Thank you, Rajasekaran Deepak
Received on Wednesday, 31 March 2004 14:05:40 UTC