- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:25:13 -0600
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa@w3.org
I'm fine with the definitions (incl. the editorial correction that Lynne suggested for "obsolete") -- they satisfy the concern that I expressed in the telecon yesterday. -Lofton. At 06:21 PM 7/12/2004 -0400, Karl Dubost wrote: >These definitions are proposition for the QA Glossary following this >thread and the discussion on the QA WG Teleconference (12 July 2004). > >* Deprecated feature > An existing feature that has become outdated > and is in the process of being phased out, > usually in favor of a specified replacement. > Deprecated features are no longer recommended > for use and may cease to exist in future > versions of the specification. > >* Obsolete feature > An existing or deprecated feature has ceased to > exist and that is listed for historical purpose. > > >For the discussion on implications about the use of deprecated, obsolete. >I will write a detailed email. > > >-- >Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ >W3C Conformance Manager >*** Be Strict To Be Cool *** > >
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2004 11:25:20 UTC