- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 15:14:49 -0500
- To: public-evangelist@w3.org, www-qa@w3.org
Interesting discussion is happening these days on Weblogs. It has started with XML Error handling, and shows the importance of QA like you will read in the last post. http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/hyatt/archives/2004_01.html#004702 http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/hyatt/archives/2004_01.html#004716 http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/hyatt/archives/2004_01.html#004721 http://diveintomark.org/archives/2004/01/16/draconianism http://diveintomark.org/archives/2004/01/14/thought_experiment http://nick.typepad.com/blog/2004/01/feeddemon_and_w.html http://nick.typepad.com/blog/2004/01/feeddemon_and_w_1.html http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/01/16/DraconianHistory http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/01/11/PostelPilgrim http://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1074730185&count=1 """Ask someone who does HTML/CSS quality assurance (QA) for a Web browser, or who has written code for a browser's layout engine. They'll go on at length about the insanities that they have seen, but the short version is that pretty much any random stream of characters has been written by someone somewhere and been labelled as HTML.""" and """Specifications should ensure that compliant implementations interoperate, whether the content is valid or not.""" Ian Hickson -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 26 January 2004 15:16:18 UTC