Personal review of QAF

In my participation in the WebOnt case study and review I felt a need to take 
a wider look at the QAF.

My review is:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jan/att-0000/

I particularly ask that various comments are treated as formal comments on
the three rec track QAF documents in accord with W3C process.

See
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jan/att-0000/#x15

This lists 8 comments each to be made against all three documents (except the 
penultimate, which is not applicable to the test guidelines).

Thus that is 23 formal comments.

Jeremy

Received on Friday, 2 January 2004 11:20:25 UTC