- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 17:19:42 +0100
- To: www-qa@w3.org
In my participation in the WebOnt case study and review I felt a need to take a wider look at the QAF. My review is: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jan/att-0000/ I particularly ask that various comments are treated as formal comments on the three rec track QAF documents in accord with W3C process. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jan/att-0000/#x15 This lists 8 comments each to be made against all three documents (except the penultimate, which is not applicable to the test guidelines). Thus that is 23 formal comments. Jeremy
Received on Friday, 2 January 2004 11:20:25 UTC