- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 10:42:36 -0500
- To: www-qa@w3.org
Just for the record, I have found these implementation reports at IETF. So it seems some WGs at IETF do interop labs. I can also notice that it seems something familiar in Protocol WGs more than markup languages ones. http://ietfreport.isoc.org/ids/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-implementation-02.txt Due to the large number of BGP implementations and the small number of responses, the editors took an informal survey to determine if the length of survey was an issue. Three implementers responded, and all indicated the length of the survey was the issue. Section 3 gives this informal survey results. The editors have compiled the submitted survey results and the informal survey results based on the submitted information. http://ietfreport.isoc.org/ids/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-mibagent-survey-02.txt This document provides a survey of BGP-4 v1 MIB implementations. After a brief summary, each response is listed. The authors make no claim as to the accuracy of the information provided. The following organizations reported having BGP-4 MIB implementations: Cisco Systems, Redback Networks, and NextHop Technologies. http://ietfreport.isoc.org/ids/draft-stiemerling-midcom-simco-interop -00.txt This memo summarizes the results of the first interoperability event for the Simple Middlebox Control (SIMCO) protocol. SIMCO is an implementation of MIDCOM for controlling middleboxes, such as firewalls and NATs. The test scenarios are described and the results of each scenario for each implementation is given. Finally, enhancements to be made to the SIMCO protocol specification are and a few others -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Wednesday, 22 December 2004 15:42:48 UTC