- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:21:21 -0400
- To: www-qa@w3.org
- Message-Id: <D83428C3-EB0A-11D8-9188-000A95718F82@w3.org>
Le 09 août 2004, à 11:44, david_marston@us.ibm.com a écrit : > In this thread, there are > questions about how far SpecGL should go in supporting such planning > ahead. At the heavy end, SpecGL would say that a spec should/must say > something about version markers, forward compatibility, and maybe even > the konds of changes that would constitute a "major" version change. (I > Somehow related issue... Spec GL has no versioning information itself. We have experienced sometimes difficulties with WG because: 1. We were evaluating their technology with a draft 2. The draft has changed heavily and so the recommendations may have changed. 3. When SpecGL becomes a Rec... Are we sure that there will not be a SpecGL New Reloaded Enhanced Super Extra version? If we are not sure, we need versioning "Eat your own dog food". -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 10 August 2004 21:15:50 UTC