- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 09:00:37 -0600
- To: david_marston@us.ibm.com,www-qa@w3.org
At 11:25 PM 7/24/2004 -0400, david_marston@us.ibm.com wrote: >[...] >Ideally, a WG would issue a versioning plan along with (or incorporated >into) their first working draft of their version 1.0, so that interested >parties can comment on the adequacy of the plan at an early enough stage. >However, the WG may not follow that plan in the future, and the TAG or >some other representative of pan-WG wisdom may change the versioning >technology or policy before 2.0 comes out. Therefore, I think its hard >for SpecGL to get very specific about versioning. "Pubrules" has apparently already reserved the topic of versioning for itself. See #3 at: http://www.w3.org/2004/02/02-pubrules.html#head Apparently these rules are not enforced, however. For example, SVG 1.2 contains a huge amount of new functionality, which is being added to SVG 1.1. -Lofton.
Received on Monday, 9 August 2004 15:00:42 UTC