- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 12:29:06 +0200
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: www-qa@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1081852146.17227.210.camel@stratustier>
Le sam 10/04/2004 à 01:34, Bjoern Hoehrmann a écrit : > >Very interesting reading! I expect you'll turn most of its contents into > >comments for the XHTML Modularization SE? > > Hmm, maybe... I am not sure what to tell them. Well, you could point them to the inconsistencies you've identified between the schema and the specification (and also those that you detail below). > I would say that mail contains just more illustration for the issue, > adding a link to the issue might be a good idea, I don't think there > is anything new here. OK, thanks for the clarification. > http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#h-4.11 > Now I do not know whether the target attribute falls into this category. > It does not suffer from the case-sensivity problem in XML DTDs... Hmm... The section you quote above reads "HTML 4 and XHTML both have some attributes that have pre-defined and limited sets of values" ; since target has pre-defined sets of of values, I guess it does fall in this category. > These do not co-exist very well... If multiple URIs are not allowed, > Tidy should fix them... How would one review Schemas that are based on > a contradictory specification that is not fixed? I guess this should be part of your review to the Schemas :) > And how to figure out > what to do for Tidy? A new data type? Special case the profile attribute > to complain about spaces but not fixing them? (my understanding of the spec is that it does allow whitespace separated URIs, so spaces should be just OK ; given the very low usage of the profile attribute, the chances that someone uses it with a non-escaped space in it seems fairly low anyway). > What I do have is > http://www.websitedev.de/markup/validator/tests/ > which might be of some interest in this regard. Most certainly, indeed. I'll try to see if I can come up with test cases showing inconsistencies (no promise, though, I don't have much time on my hands, and I'm far from being any expert in XML Schema...). One idea to help testing at least this type of specification: generate documents based on the different formal specifications (DTD, XML Schema, Relax NG) and cross-validate them ; I don't know how hard this would be, though... Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 13 April 2004 06:29:24 UTC