- From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 10:32:01 -0600 (MDT)
- To: Brian Kelly <B.Kelly@ukoln.ac.uk>
- Cc: www-qa@w3.org
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Brian Kelly wrote: > It's becoming unclear to me with the QA group is the technical marketing > wing of W3C or an honest balanced broker of advice, covering legitimate > concerns over deployment issues. > > I would prefer the latter approach (I think the former approach will > lead to dangers of W3C being marginalised - a sentiment I hear fairly > frequently). I would expect W3C bias and would have no problems with it as long as it is explicit. It is perfectly fine for a W3C WG to be a biased advocate of W3C technologies, but it is not morally acceptable for a WG to engage in FUD wars, IMO. Alex.
Received on Friday, 17 October 2003 12:35:30 UTC