LC comment for SpecGL : 'Section 3.4 - AAA-terminology useless'

Here is a last call comment from Jonathan Marsh (jmarsh@microsoft.com) 
on QA Framework : Specifications Guidelines (and Examples and Techniques)
received by the LC form system.

Submitted on behalf of: WS Description WG
Comment type: Substantive
The comment applies to: "Overall"
Comment title: Section 3.4 - AAA-terminology useless

Comment:
The introduction of A[A][A]-conforming as a synonym for the three priorities is rather absurd, as is the creation of four levels that will never be used.  A-conforming = priority one = level three; AA-conforming = priority two = level five; AAA-conforming = priority three = level seven.

Proposed resolution : 
Pick one set of terms and toss the remainder.  (N.B.: the association of priorities with levels is a consequence of Ops guideline 1).
]]

-- 
This comment was submitted through the lastCall form system,
designed by Martin Duerst and Adapted for the QAWG by Olivier Thereaux.

Received on Monday, 31 March 2003 14:19:18 UTC