- From: by way of the Lastcall Form <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 04:19 +0900
- To: www-qa@w3.org
Here is a last call comment from Jonathan Marsh (jmarsh@microsoft.com) on QA Framework : Specifications Guidelines (and Examples and Techniques) received by the LC form system. Submitted on behalf of: WS Description WG Comment type: Substantive The comment applies to: "Overall" Comment title: Section 3.4 - AAA-terminology useless Comment: The introduction of A[A][A]-conforming as a synonym for the three priorities is rather absurd, as is the creation of four levels that will never be used. A-conforming = priority one = level three; AA-conforming = priority two = level five; AAA-conforming = priority three = level seven. Proposed resolution : Pick one set of terms and toss the remainder. (N.B.: the association of priorities with levels is a consequence of Ops guideline 1). ]] -- This comment was submitted through the lastCall form system, designed by Martin Duerst and Adapted for the QAWG by Olivier Thereaux.
Received on Monday, 31 March 2003 14:19:18 UTC