LC comment for SpecGL : 'Priorities confusing' from by way of the Lastcall Form on 2003-03-31 (www-qa@w3.org from March 2003)

From: by way of the Lastcall Form <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 03:52 +0900
To: www-qa@w3.org
Message-Id: <20030331185201.51E6D392@toro.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>

Here is a last call comment from Jonathan Marsh (jmarsh@microsoft.com) 
on QA Framework : Specifications Guidelines (and Examples and Techniques)
received by the LC form system.

Submitted on behalf of: WS Description WG
Comment type: Substantive
The comment applies to: "Guideline 3 Specify conformance policy. "
Comment title: Priorities confusing

Comment:
The priorities here are very strange.  Why is justifying the use of a dimension priority one, while establishing a minimum requirement is priority two?


Proposed resolution : 

]]

-- 
This comment was submitted through the lastCall form system,
designed by Martin Duerst and Adapted for the QAWG by Olivier Thereaux.

Received on Monday, 31 March 2003 13:52:03 UTC