- From: by way of the Lastcall Form <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 03:46 +0900
- To: www-qa@w3.org
Here is a last call comment from Jonathan Marsh (jmarsh@microsoft.com) on QA Framework : Specifications Guidelines (and Examples and Techniques) received by the LC form system. Submitted on behalf of: WS Description WG Comment type: Editorial The comment applies to: "Overall" Comment title: Complexity of numbering Comment: Guidelines escape the section/technical numbering of the remainder of the document. Why isn't guideline 1 section 2.1? And checkpoint 1.2 section 2.1.2? This is going to cause confusion, when others make reference to the document: if I say 3.2, do I mean a checkpoint or a section? Section 2 is by far the bulk of the document; perhaps each guideline ought to be given a section number instead (guidelines 2 through 15, then, instead of 1 through 14). Proposed resolution : Find a non-conflicting numbering scheme. ]] -- This comment was submitted through the lastCall form system, designed by Martin Duerst and Adapted for the QAWG by Olivier Thereaux.
Received on Monday, 31 March 2003 13:46:47 UTC