- From: by way of the Lastcall Form <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 05:54 +0900
- To: www-qa@w3.org
Here is a last call comment from Lofton Henderson (lofton@rockynet.com) on QA Framework : Operational Guidelines (and Examples and Techniques) received by the LC form system. Submitted on behalf of: N/A Comment type: Substantive The comment applies to: "Overall" Comment title: OpsGL fails SpecGL checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3 Comment: [This is really a comment about the "Introduction" section.] "Operational Guidelines" (OpsGL) fails Checkpoints 1.2 (priority 2) and 1.3 (priority 3) of "Specification Guidelines", by not illustrating its scope with examples and/or use cases, and not providing usage scenarios. Alternatives: 1.) Add examples and/or use cases, and provide usage scenarios; 2.) No need to, these are "not applicable" to OpsGL; 3.) No need to, OpsGL only needs to conform to itself at level "A-Conforming" (only priority 1 checkpoints). While I believe that alternative #1 is the correct alternative, it might be helpful for OpsGL to explain its intentions about conformance (A or AA or AAA?) to SpecGL. I.e., should OpsGL contain a SpecGL conformance claim? Proposed resolution : Alternative #1. ]] -- This comment was submitted through the lastCall form system, designed by Martin Duerst and Adapted for the QAWG by Olivier Thereaux.
Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2003 15:54:26 UTC