- From: by way of the Lastcall Form <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 05:18 +0900
- To: www-qa@w3.org
Here is a last call comment from Lofton Henderson (lofton@rockynet.com) on QA Framework : Specifications Guidelines (and Examples and Techniques) received by the LC form system. Submitted on behalf of: N/A Comment type: Substantive The comment applies to: "Guideline 1 Define Scope." Comment title: SpecGL fails checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3 Comment: [This is really a comment about the "Introduction" section.] "Specification Guidelines" (SpecGL) fails its own Checkpoints 1.2 (priority 2) and 1.3 (priority 3), by not illustrating its scope with examples and/or use cases, and not providing usage scenarios: Alternatives: 1.) Add examples and/or use cases, and provide usage scenarios; 2.) No need to, these are "not applicable" to SpecGL; 3.) No need to, SpecGL only needs to conform to itself at level "A-Conforming" (only priority 1 checkpoints). While I believe that alternative #1 is the correct alternative, it might be helpful for SpecGL to explain its intentions about self-conformance (p1 or p2 or p3?). I.e., should SpecGL contain a SpecGL conformance claim? Proposed resolution : Alternative #1. ]] -- This comment was submitted through the lastCall form system, designed by Martin Duerst and Adapted for the QAWG by Olivier Thereaux.
Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2003 15:18:55 UTC