- From: by way of the Lastcall Form <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 03:12 +0900
- To: www-qa@w3.org
Here is a last call comment from Phill Jenkins (pjenkins@us.ibm.com) on QA Framework : Operational Guidelines (and Examples and Techniques) received by the LC form system. Submitted on behalf of: N/A Comment type: Substantive The comment applies to: "Overall" Comment title: Checklist format issue Comment: [Entered into form by LH. Comment applies to Checklists of SpecGL and TestGL as well OpsGL.] I have noticed a number of "checklists" being proliferated on the W3C pages. I have a strong recommendation for improving the adaptability of the checklist format - namely the number of column in the layout. For example, today most have a column for the number of the checkpoint, the description of the checkpoint, and then a number of columns for YES, NO, N/A. Please consider adapting the following format: Top matter: Version, date, owner, etc Column 1 10% Checkpoint number Column 2 40% Description Column 3 10% YES, NO, N/A, Planned Column 4 40% Comments Bottom matter: Footnotes, exceptions, references, etc. an example we find useful is at http://www-3.ibm.com/able/accesssoftware.html [[Following is (unarchived) comment from Ian Jacobs: We redesigned the UAAG 1.0 checklist [1] based on earlier comments from you [1]. We don't specify fixed widths for table columns. - Ian [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-UAAG10-20021217/uaag10-chktable.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2000AprJun/0137.html ]] Proposed resolution : ]] -- This comment was submitted through the lastCall form system, designed by Martin Duerst and Adapted for the QAWG by Olivier Thereaux.
Received on Saturday, 15 March 2003 13:12:05 UTC