LC comment for SpecGL : 'Section 3.4 Conformance definition'

Here is a last call comment from Lynne Rosenthal (lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov) 
on QA Framework : Specifications Guidelines (and Examples and Techniques)
received by the LC form system.

Submitted on behalf of: Ian Jacobs
Comment type: Editorial
The comment applies to: "Overall"
Comment title: Section 3.4 Conformance definition

Comment:
" A checkpoint is satisfied by satisfying all of the individual @@conformance requirements@@. Failing one individual mandatory requirement means that the checkpoint is not satisfied."

Is previous sentence required? 

Proposed resolution : 

]]

-- 
This comment was submitted through the lastCall form system,
designed by Martin Duerst and Adapted for the QAWG by Olivier Thereaux.

Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2003 11:41:37 UTC