- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 07:10:58 -0400
- To: www-qa@w3.org, lesch@w3.org
At 14:57 -0600 2003-06-12, Alex Rousskov wrote: > > "When these key words are used in the RFC sense, make them UPPERCASE, > > enclose them in the em element, and style them with CSS to make the > > UPPERCASE readable. > > <em title="MUST in RFC 2119 context" > > class="RFC2119">MUST</em> > > >> .RFC2119 { >> text-transform: lowercase; >> font-style: italic; > > } " > > > > and the recommended styling removes the uppercase from the view of > > the document as seen in most browsers, so it is impossible for a > > reader to see whether the word is being used normatively or normally > > (with emphasis). the style is also italic :) so there will be still a difference and if you add a colour. I guess you might be fine. > > So, which is it? MAY what the reader sees on their screen look like > > lowercase italic, or MUST it look like uppercase Roman? > >Hmm... The "lowercase" text-transform looks like a typo unless the >authors consider true uppercase not "readable". Personally, I much >prefer "MUST" to "must" because many documents use lower case words as >just words, not RFC2119 keywords. It's not a typo it's more an english readability issue. Some people prefer to have it lowercase. -- Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager http://www.w3.org/QA/ --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
Received on Monday, 23 June 2003 07:15:51 UTC