- From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 10:17:09 -0600 (MDT)
- To: www-qa@w3.org
Just a few bug reports/suggestions about the Matrix. 1a. There is no legend for images and colors used in table cells. Please consider adding one or see 1b. 1b. Consider having three [borderless] columns inside the "Validator..." column so that it is easy to see which specs lack a test suite, for example. Cool undocumented image icons can then be replaced with a well-understood check-mark icon. 1c. Perhaps it is my Opera, but there is lots of unused white space to the right of the matrix table, while the table cells are shorter than their text wants them to be. This makes the matrix much longer than it needs to be. 1d. The intro says "no means not applicable or not available" but the matrix uses empty cells or cells with "-" instead. 1e. The "This version of the Matrix has been produced" paragraph should be moved to the bottom since most people do not care how the table was produced. 1f. The "RDF maintained list of QA related info" link returns a 404: http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/06/matrix-base 2a. HTTP/1.1 Conformance Section is available at http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec1.html#sec1.2 2b. HTTP/1.1 errata document is maintained by Scott Lawrence at http://purl.org/NET/http-errata 2c. HTTP/1.1 "Test Suite" link [1] points to a list of test sites (most of which are dead now); it should point to a list of test suites [2]. The icon should be changes from "W3C" to "Tools". [1] http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/Forum/#Test [2] somebody would need to add an anchor for the following H2 title on the same page <H2>Other Testing Opportunities and Resources</H2> 3. "HTML 4.0 Recommendation" cell should probably be just "HTML 4.0", since other spec cells do not have "Recommendation" in them. Disclaimer: item (2c) is a partial self-promotion. Thanks, Alex. -- | HTTP performance - Web Polygraph benchmark www.measurement-factory.com | HTTP compliance+ - Co-Advisor test suite | all of the above - PolyBox appliance
Received on Friday, 6 June 2003 12:17:11 UTC