- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@HPLB.HPL.HP.COM>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 18:58:27 +0100
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- CC: www-qa@w3.org
Karl Dubost wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > I will reply to your mails in details later on (I'm on holiday this week.) > Above and beyond the call of duty. > 1. Thank you very much for your comments. It's always valuable to have > them and progress. Would you like to join the QA WG? No - too busy. Also I doubt I subscribe to your charter ... Paragraph 2 of section 2 mentions conformance testing I am increasingly convinced that conformance testing is not appropriate for W3C other than document validators. I haven't looked at the WAI conformance testing ... > 2. New WDs will be published soon and they address some of your comments > I think. We added and removed things at the last F2F. Probably, but I suspect the bulk of my comments are not addressable without more work than I expect you to do. > 3. Would you like to be the QA contact for the OWL WG as well? So it > will be beneficial for us to have your valuable input and experience. > I think it is relevant for you to remember editors of Test documents as a significant part of the W3C community; in the discussion on the specification guidelines it was clear that I was somewhat more extreme than some members (but no means all) of the WebOnt WG. > More comments on Monday. > > Best regards. Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2003 13:59:05 UTC