- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 17:57:01 +0100
- To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
- CC: www-qa@w3.org, connolly@w3.org
> P.S. I doubt I would ever write a "2+2 MUST be X" statement in a spec. > I am using provided examples simply to illustrate the point that > it is impossible to clearly specify when to use MUSTs and when > to use BEs. Note that the original question of this thread is > somewhat different: whether anything but MUSTs can be used in > a compliant specification to form CRs? > Yes your [[ Conformance requirements: The test suite MUST define it scopes, goal, and intended purpose. ]] seems to be a semantic error to me. The developer of the test suite may have to define its scopes and goals. Test suites don't have to do anything. Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2003 13:08:01 UTC