- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:46:18 -0500
- To: <www-qa@w3.org>
- Cc: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
At 9:28 -0700 2003-01-15, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Karl Dubost wrote:
>
> > But there's an interesting comment here. How to ensure that all the
>> public comments are taken into account
>
>The solution already exists. It is called a "bug database" or "problem
>report database" and can be implemented using free software like
>bugzilla (http://bugzilla.org/). The system can be setup so that
>anybody can submit a comment/bug/report and then see how WG reacts to
>it. A WG does not have to respond to every bug report in detail, but
>has to either assign/resolve a bug or mark it as "not bug", etc.,
>specifying the reason for status change.
And it's already installed. We have a public Bugzilla at the W3C
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/
Right now it is used for
CSS validator
Link Checker
LogValidator
Validator
Maybe it could be used for WG. It's something to organize.
--
Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager
http://www.w3.org/QA/
--- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 18:46:25 UTC