- From: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:42:53 +0100 (MET)
- To: web-human@w3.org
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, www-qa@w3.org
I noticed that the W3C uses CSS pseudo-classes for at least active states without using any specific selector (see [1], there also several other cases I didn't list here, e.g. embedded styles in [2]; I encountered most of them in technical documents): :active { color: #ff0000; } This consequently causes e.g. Mozilla user-agents to highlight each (active) element in red; is this intended, or a mistake (as I presume)? -- Since I encountered feedback from irritated visitors yet (using my W3C translations), I fixed this on my Web site (by using an element selector since these pseudo-classes only seem to be intended to highlight active links). Again, is this meant or not? And by the way, since various W3C documents seem to use CSS in an inconsequent manner (some use embedded, some external CSS, where some are located in the document folder, others in a central location), wouldn't this be easier to maintain when there are as few CSS files as possible being all located centrally (and thus accounting for one of CSS' purposes and advantages)? All the best, Jens. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-ruby-20010531/style.css [2] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/modularization -- Jens Meiert Interface Architect http://meiert.com/
Received on Monday, 1 December 2003 03:45:01 UTC