www-qa@w3.org from September 2002 by date

Monday, 30 September 2002

• Re: QA f2f - logistics - "last call" Lofton Henderson
• QA matrix for SMIL 2.0 Thierry Michel

Friday, 27 September 2002

• Re: Does Informative = Non-Normative Alex Rousskov
• Re: use of Priority vs Conformance Levels Lynne Rosenthal
• Re: use of Priority vs Conformance Levels Lofton Henderson
• Does Informative = Non-Normative Lynne Rosenthal

Wednesday, 25 September 2002

• Final minutes for QAWG telcon 20020918 Dimitris Dimitriadis

Tuesday, 24 September 2002

• Short Spec and Spec Guidelines lsr@nist.gov
• Re: Short Spec and Spec Guidelines David Marston/Cambridge/IBM
• Re: Short Spec and Spec Guidelines Alex Rousskov
• Short Spec and Spec Guidelines Karl Dubost
• An interface to Web testing services Brian Kelly

Friday, 20 September 2002

• Re: Conformance claims, Priorities Alex Rousskov
• Re: Extensions Alex Rousskov
• Conformance claims, Priorities (was: Re: FYI : a new draft of "QA Framework - Specifications Guidelines" published) Lofton Henderson
• Extensions -- correction Lofton Henderson
• Extensions (was: Re: FYI : a new draft of "QA Framework - Specifications Guidelines" published) Lofton Henderson

Thursday, 19 September 2002

• RE: testability definition Lofton Henderson

Tuesday, 17 September 2002

• Final Meeting Minutes for QA Working Group Teleconference Wednesday, 04-September-2002 Mark Skall

Thursday, 12 September 2002

• new "week in QA" summary published Olivier Thereaux

Wednesday, 11 September 2002

• Re: Does the QA's RSS news feed work Chris Croome
• Re: Does the QA's RSS news feed work Dominique Hazaël-Massieux
• Re: Does the QA's RSS news feed work Chris Croome
• Re: Does the QA's RSS news feed work Dominique Hazaël-Massieux
• Re: Does the QA's RSS news feed work Karl Dubost
• Re: Does the QA's RSS news feed work Karl Dubost
• Does the QA's RSS news feed work Brian Kelly
• RE: addition to CUAP? Brian Kelly
• addition to CUAP? Yves Lafon

Monday, 9 September 2002

• RE: testability definition Alex Rousskov
• RE: testability definition Mark Skall
• RE: testability definition Alex Rousskov
• RE: testability definition Lynne Rosenthal
• RE: testability definition Alex Rousskov
• RE: testability definition Kirill Gavrylyuk
• Re: testability definition Alex Rousskov
• Re: testability definition skall@nist.gov

Sunday, 8 September 2002

• work from home we will help you. pele
• Re: testability definition Alex Rousskov
• Re: testability definition Alex Rousskov

Saturday, 7 September 2002

• Re: testability definition (was: Re: FYI : a new draft of "QA Framework - Specifications Guidelines" published) Mark Skall
• RE: testability definition Alex Rousskov
• RE: testability definition Kirill Gavrylyuk

Friday, 6 September 2002

• RE: testability definition Kirill Gavrylyuk
• RE: testability definition Alex Rousskov
• RE: testability definition Alex Rousskov
• RE: testability definition Kirill Gavrylyuk
• Re: DoV and verifiability Lofton Henderson
• RE: testability definition (was: Re: FYI : a new draft of "QA Framework - Specifications Guidelines" published) Kirill Gavrylyuk
• Re: testability definition Alex Rousskov
• testability definition (was: Re: FYI : a new draft of "QA Framework - Specifications Guidelines" published) Lofton Henderson
• Re: DoV and verifiability Alex Rousskov
• Re: DoV and verifiability David Marston/Cambridge/IBM
• Re: DoV and verifiability Alex Rousskov
• DoV and verifiability (was: Re: Should SpecGL be a spec?) Lofton Henderson
• Re: Should SpecGL be a spec? Lofton Henderson
• Re: Should SpecGL be a spec? Lynne Rosenthal
• Re: Should SpecGL be a spec? Alex Rousskov
• next QA WG/IG face-to-face meeting Olivier Thereaux
• Re: Should SpecGL be a spec? Lofton Henderson

Thursday, 5 September 2002

• Re: Should SpecGL be a spec? Lynne Rosenthal
• Re: Should SpecGL be a spec? Lofton Henderson
• Re: Should SpecGL be a spec? Alex Rousskov
• Re: Should SpecGL be a spec? Lofton Henderson
• Should SpecGL be a spec? Alex Rousskov
• Re: FYI : a new draft of "QA Framework - Specifications Guidelines" published Alex Rousskov
• "week(s) in QA" - request for feedback Olivier Thereaux

Wednesday, 4 September 2002

• ¥h°£¸y»Ä­Iµh¡A3¤ÀÄÁ¨£®Ä David Wang

Tuesday, 3 September 2002

• normative keywords (was Re: FYI : a new draft of "QA Framework - Specifications Guidelines" published) Lofton Henderson
• Re: Please comment: proposed Test Suite framework and process for XForms David Marston/Cambridge/IBM
• Please comment: proposed Test Suite framework and process for XFo rms Micah Dubinko
• Re: FYI : a new draft of "QA Framework - Specifications Guidelines" published Dominique Hazaël-Massieux

Last message date: Monday, 30 September 2002 09:45:58 UTC