- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 16 May 2002 23:16:54 -0500
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa@w3.org, Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 22:59, Karl Dubost wrote: [...] > As I said the guidelines 3 is not about the content of the > conformance clause, is about what kind of requirements you have to do > if you put a conformance clause in your spec as an editor. So add another guideline or something. Just make sure the QA guidelines makes the point that levels/options are best avoided (unless you disagree, in which case please explain why). > So you still miss the point, IMHO. Likewise. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 17 May 2002 00:41:05 UTC