- From: <scott_boag@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 15:57:26 -0400
- To: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>
- Cc: spec-prod@w3.org, w3c-query-editors@w3.org, www-qa@w3.org
You sound like you're jumping the gun a little bit. To me, XPath/XQuery/XSLT are perfect candidates because of their complexity. How much have we really thought about testing and verification? I do agree that we would need some sort of quick proposal and then concept test in fairly short order, to see how tractable this can be made. -scott |---------+--------------------------------------------> | | Jonathan Robie | | | <jonathan.robie@datadirect-techno| | | logies.com> | | | | | | 05/06/2002 03:59 PM | | | | |---------+--------------------------------------------> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: scott_boag@us.ibm.com | | cc: spec-prod@w3.org, w3c-query-editors@w3.org, www-qa@w3.org | | Subject: Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications | >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| It sounds like we have an experimental idea that may or may not turn out to be helpful, but which we suspect is likely to result in an as-yet-unknown amount of work. As a first step, I would suggest testing this on a small scale with a spec where the editors are particularly interested in trying this. Jonathan
Received on Monday, 6 May 2002 16:05:53 UTC