- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 17:14:17 -0400
- To: www-qa@w3.org
At the last QA F2F in Montreal (June 2002), we have discussed about the opportunity to make the QA Framework a requirement for the specifications and the WGs. I'm right now reviewing the Charmod specification http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-charmod-20020430/ There's an interesting paragraph in the introduction. **** "All W3C specifications must conform to this document (see section 2 Conformance). Authors of other specifications (for example, IETF specifications) are strongly encouraged to take guidance from it. Since other W3C specifications will be based on some of the provisions of this document, without repeating them, software developers implementing W3C specifications must conform to these provisions." **** In the Conformance http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-charmod-20020430/#sec-Conformance **** Every W3C specification MUST: 1. conform to the requirements applicable to specifications, 2. specify that implementations MUST conform to the requirements applicable to software, and 3. specify that content created according to that specification MUST conform to the requirements applicable to content. [S] If an existing W3C specification does not conform to the requirements in this document, then the next version of that specification SHOULD be modified in order to conform. [I] Where this specification contains a procedural description, it MUST be understood as a way to specify the desired external behavior. Implementations MAY use other ways of achieving the same results, as long as observable behavior is not affected. **** -- Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager http://www.w3.org/QA/ --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2002 17:22:51 UTC