- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 17:14:17 -0400
- To: www-qa@w3.org
At the last QA F2F in Montreal (June 2002), we have discussed about
the opportunity to make the QA Framework a requirement for the
specifications and the WGs.
I'm right now reviewing the Charmod specification
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-charmod-20020430/
There's an interesting paragraph in the introduction.
****
"All W3C specifications must conform to this document (see section 2
Conformance). Authors of other specifications (for example, IETF
specifications) are strongly encouraged to take guidance from it.
Since other W3C specifications will be based on some of the
provisions of this document, without repeating them, software
developers implementing W3C specifications must conform to these
provisions."
****
In the Conformance
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-charmod-20020430/#sec-Conformance
****
Every W3C specification MUST:
1. conform to the requirements applicable to specifications,
2. specify that implementations MUST conform to the requirements
applicable to software, and
3. specify that content created according to that specification
MUST conform to the requirements applicable to content.
[S] If an existing W3C specification does not conform to the
requirements in this document, then the next version of that
specification SHOULD be modified in order to conform.
[I] Where this specification contains a procedural description, it
MUST be understood as a way to specify the desired external behavior.
Implementations MAY use other ways of achieving the same results, as
long as observable behavior is not affected.
****
--
Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager
http://www.w3.org/QA/
--- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2002 17:22:51 UTC