- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 08:49:42 +0100
- To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- CC: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, www-qa@w3.org
Al Gilman wrote: Ian wrote: >>According to the Process Doc, it's not possible to exit CR without >>either entering WD or PR. There are no in-between states. All state >>changes are achieved through messages (in this case to the AC). You >>may have finished getting implementation experience, edited the >>CR document to prepare it for PR, talked to the Director about >>advancing to PR, and more, but until the Director sends a >>state-change message to the AC, you are still in CR. At any phase, >>there is the "Abandon" option, in which case the spec should be >>published as a Note. >> >> >Al Gilman wrote: > I am just trying to understand where this leaves the QA document. I think I > missed a cycle. > > Are you, Ian, comfortable with leaving "exit from CR" in the QA document as a > collloquialism we use to connect with people on their own terms; while the > document still makes clear that the defining role of the criteria against which > one is building a compliance record during CR is that they are the criteria > that have been set for entry into PR? Yes, I am comfortable with people talking about CR-exit criteria (and use it myself, though I didn't inhale). :) - Ian -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2002 02:55:10 UTC