- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 14:18:40 -0700
- To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
- Cc: www-qa@w3.org
Okay, this is fixed now. Both SpecGL and the checklist are updated to fix the links. Now these two file properly reference each other, and the checklist corresponds to the checkpoints in SpecGL: http://www.w3.org/2002/12/QA/WG/qaframe-spec-20021220 http://www.w3.org/2002/12/QA/WG/qaframe-spec-checklist-20021220 -Lofton. At 11:58 AM 12/30/2002 -0700, Lofton Henderson wrote: >Thanks for the heads-up, Alex. > >Actually, it is worse than you say. The checklist that is there does not >correspond to the 20021220 SpecGL version. It is an old one. See for >example the first couple of checkpoints of GL9 or GL10. > >I'll see if I can do something about it. Meanwhile, please ignore the >Checklist. > >-Lofton. > >At 09:14 AM 12/30/2002 -0700, you wrote: > > >>FYI: Links to SpecGL checkpoints in [1] point to OpsGL document [2], >>resulting in 404 Not Found erros. Manually replacing -ops with -spec >>in the link URL fixes the problem. >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2002/12/qaframe-spec-checklist.html >> [2] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2002/12/qaframe-ops >> >>Alex. >> >>-- >> | HTTP performance - Web Polygraph benchmark >>www.measurement-factory.com | HTTP compliance+ - Co-Advisor test suite >> | all of the above - PolyBox appliance > >
Received on Monday, 30 December 2002 16:23:04 UTC