- From: Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 16:27:32 +0900
- To: www-qa@w3.org
QA Interest Group, Monday (august 26th) the QA working Group has published a new draft of "QA Framework: Specification Guidelines" Latest version : http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/ This version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-qaframe-spec-20020826/ Reviewing the work of the QAWG is one of the primary tasks of this interest group, so I encourage you to go read/review this draft. Early review will be a crucial factor in the quality of this QA framework. May I draw attention on "issues" for this draft: [[ In addition to feedback about the overall direction and organization, there are specific issues about which the QAWG desires feedback. The most persistent issues involve the relationships amongst the ways of dividing or grouping the technology -- profiles, modules, levels -- and whether there are relationships that are better (should be encouraged) and ones that are worse (should be discouraged). Some specific issues are flagged in the text, and may also be found in the QAWG Issues List[1], specifically atomicity of modules[2], levels minimality[3], modules-levels[4], levels-profiles[5], legacy specifications[6]. (Issues and editor notes are flagged in the text with "@@".) ]] [1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/qawg-issues-html [2] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/qawg-issues-html#x73 [3] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/qawg-issues-html#x74 [4] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/qawg-issues-html#x75 [5] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/qawg-issues-html#x76 [6] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/qawg-issues-html#x77 Please send reviews to this list <www-qa@w3.org> Thanks. olivier. -- Olivier Thereaux - W3C http://www.w3.org/People/olivier | http://yoda.zoy.org
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2002 03:27:34 UTC