Re: useful QA gizmo: check popular docs for HTML validity

I just noticed a couple mistakes in my previous message:

On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 04:41:51AM -0400, Gerald Oskoboiny wrote:
:
> our policy is not to change dated versions of documents in our
> TR space [1],

I meant "... our policy is to not change dated versions"
(hmm... now I'm splitting an infinitive; what's the right way
to phrase that, I wonder?)

> When we first ran this report against the documents on www.w3.org
> in September 1999, 20 of the top 53 documents on our site were
> invalid. In the most recent report (below), 20 of the top 449
> documents are valid,

that should be "... 20 of the top 449 documents are invalid".

-- 
Gerald Oskoboiny     http://www.w3.org/People/Gerald/
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)    http://www.w3.org/
tel:+1-613-261-6630             mailto:gerald@w3.org

Received on Saturday, 29 September 2001 06:02:11 UTC