- From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 11:28:05 -0600 (MDT)
- To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
- cc: www-qa@w3.org
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Aaron Swartz wrote: > On Sunday, September 16, 2001, at 11:37 AM, Alex Rousskov wrote: > > > Often, webmasters have to use <h2> for first-level titles. > > Why do you "have to"? Is it an absolute necessity that all your > users see the title smaller? Does your page not use <font> tags? > I find it hard to believe that this would ever be needed. Using <h2> is not absolute necessity. Using <h1> is not either. This is not a question of absolute necessity. This is a question of what a person writing/generating HTML should use. Both <h1> and <h2> are bad (for different reasons discussed on this thread). If I write/generate relatively simple pages that do not need CSS to look good, I will not introduce CSS just to make picky HTML parsers happier. If I write/generate pages that have to rely on CSS for other reasons, your suggestion is perfectly valid. My point is that CSS is not acceptable as a "general recommended workaround". Otherwise, you should just recommend to always use XML + CSS (or similar) instead of HTML. Alex.
Received on Sunday, 16 September 2001 13:28:06 UTC